End of Mother's Day Series, The Mothering of Mother Earth and Mother Creatures

Well this is later than I had planned, partly because what I was going to go with, when I watched several videos on the abandonment of children, the anti-mother sentiments that are increasing, etc., and especially two videos, one on the horrors of Institutionalized Parenting [which I personally know a little about, lived in orphanage when 14 for a year but even then it was not as horrid as those in Nanny Police States--though those Do exist in America], but what really disturbed me was a video I saw in regards to one Nation using Feminism--and Liberation from Poverty [so they claimed] as nothing more than a means to Trafficking and ENSLAVE POOR CHILDREN, which I will be showing this week...

so anyway my thoughts on what to write here began to take on a transformation but not sure really where it's going--so, for now, I am going to post some photos, you look at them and this will allow me some time to put this together however the Holy Spirit leads me to, these are Female Animals, Mothers.

And while you look at them, think to yourself, how many Humans would be brave enough to go up to these mothers and attempt to 'take their young away' and then, Why that is?  What is it about Their power, compared to the Power of Female Mothers...in how the Societies or Tribes rather, TREAT the MOTHERS of both...

http://pixdaus.com/index.php?pageno=16&query=moth&sort=search

http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/G991956/

 

http://www.betterphoto.com/gallery/dynoGallDetail.asp?photoID=7014172&catID=29641

http://famous.tm/nature/

http://www.dunzie.com/animals/100119-the-10-most-extreme-mother-animals.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1192225/Mother-Natures-humdingers-The-awesome-animals-turn-laws-science-upside-down.html

Now, what WE, under Patriarchy [male dominion with some, but not a lot, of female help and of course the Power Hegemony of Wealth and CONSUMPTION] to THEIR HOMES

http://politicalclimate.wordpress.com/

Actual Nuke Test, Ocean, one of Many...  
http://www.wetasschronicles.com/archives/2005_11_06_archive.html

COUNTRY USA   RUSSIA   UK   FRANCE   CHINA   TOTAL

No OF TESTS 1,030 715 45 204 41 2,035 nuclear bombs!

DATE OF FIRST TEST 14th July 1945 29th August 1949 3rd October 1952 13th February 1960 8th May 1964

DATE OF LAST TEST 23rd September 1992 24th October 1990 26th November 1991 15th July 1991 15th May 1995

see rest of Nuclear Testing Info including Numbers of Deaths caused by, here:
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/nuclear_testing.htm

This used to be a Rain Forest [home for numerous animals, birds, etc]

http://www.scienceclarified.com/everyday/Real-Life-Earth-Science-Vol-3/Ecology-and-Ecological-Stress-Real-life-applications.html

Polluted lakes and Rivers

http://www.sos-arsenic.net/english/environment/

TOXIC DUMPING IN 'POOR' PEOPLE'S LANDS

http://www.chevroninecuador.com/2009_06_01_archive.html

Land that Could have been used for FARMLAND to feed NUMEROUS STARVING--YET, LIKE NUMEROUS COUNTRIES IT CAN'T BE,

WHY?  BECAUSE OF OVERPOPULATION-BABIES?  MOMMIES? 

NO

TRY, ANOTHER...

L.A.N.D.M.I.N.E.S.

http://www.mineaction.org/overview.asp?o=1337

AIR POLLUTION, and guess what, last I knew, BABIES DIDN'T DRIVE...China did NOT look like this when they used Bikes even With overpopulation [which btw, was due to patriarchal 'mandates' for none other than a huge ass Army]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x268520

Tomorrow I will follow up on this series, but for now...

I find it amazing, that the Destruction of the Mother animals and their babies Habitat, wasn't done by Human Mothers and Babies, HARDLY

it was done by

CARS [CONSUMPTION]
TOXIC DUMPING
NUCLEAR [WAR]
OIL, OIL, OIL [CONSUMPTION]
WOODS FOR HOUSES [NOT FOR YOUR AVERAGE FAMILY OF FOUR, OH NO, THEY CAN'T AFFORD IT, FOR TWO PEOPLE FAMILIES WITH ONE KID, THE YOUNG PROFESSIONALS OR WITH NO KIDS, THOSE 200,000 TO 1,000,000 CONDOS/LOFTS, ETC--IT'S STATUS REMEMBER] taken from FORESTS
FORESTS DESTROYED FOR LAND FOR 'COWS' FOR AMERICAN/WESTERN 'BEEF' EATERS
A.K.A. RESTAURANTS FOR THE 'RICH' [most families can't afford that usually]
etc etc etc

My POINT being, that the Destruction of the Planet, is NOT due to Babies or Mothers, but the Devaluing of, for none other than

CONSUMPTION AND GREED.

that, and WAR, for CONSUMPTION AND GREED [ECONOMIC INTERESTS]

see the Connection?

Tomorrow, what is Mother Nature, answering Back with?


Jane